▲ | pixelpoet 4 days ago | ||||||||||||||||||||||
My objection is in direct analogy to "could care less": it fails to rule out the very thing that is to be ruled out. The grains of sand example should make it clear: it is not true that this grain is one of few at the beach, but it is true that it's one of the only. This makes it a poor expression for scarcity, and while obviously we know what was actually intended (as with "could care less"), that doesn't really make it any better. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
▲ | shayway 4 days ago | parent | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||
I'm trying to understand but struggling -- so it is specifically the phrase "one of the only" that bothers you, but the example of "only five minutes late" is acceptable? And the issue is that "only" in that context doesn't mean a singular item, but rather a group of ambiguous size? | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
▲ | jacobolus 4 days ago | parent | prev [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||
edit: this conversation is a waste of time. retracting my comment | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|