|
| ▲ | dweekly 5 days ago | parent | next [-] |
| Face recognition is uninuitively good. Google Photos was able to pick out faces from my baby photos pretty easily. |
| |
| ▲ | SchemaLoad 5 days ago | parent | next [-] | | I was thinking about that a while ago and came to the conclusion that it's likely massively helped out by the narrow search space. They aren't trying to match between every single person, just the ones in your photo library which is an extremely small group compared to what most facial recognition is doing. | |
| ▲ | KPGv2 5 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Google's face recognition can't tell the difference between my 5yo and my newborn. And, most hilarious, my 8yo could unlock my wife's iPhone with face recognition when she was 2yo. | |
| ▲ | ramraj07 5 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Google Photos works in a near perfect extremely constrained closed system: your photos have fewer than a hundred faces, it likely biases uncertainties with more confidence due to those constraints. | | |
| ▲ | vasco 5 days ago | parent [-] | | Funny because I don't use the feature and in my review tab I have like 15 versions of myself that google thinks are all different people for me to individually name. Mostly different phases of facial hair. |
| |
| ▲ | koolala 5 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Custom ads based on your baby facial expressions 15 years later? | |
| ▲ | jrrv 5 days ago | parent | prev [-] | | Really? Mine lumps together completely unrelated people whilst failing to group together the same person. |
|
|
| ▲ | SXX 5 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Well. Until that film or metadata getting uploaded on Meta servers or checked by some local child-safety AI, getting flagged for inappropriate meterial and police knocking on your door. |
|
| ▲ | lynndotpy 5 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I disagree with your assumption, but you also need to consider that the baby is going to be a person for decades. |
|
| ▲ | latexr 5 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2022/aug/22/google-cs... |
|
| ▲ | jahsome 5 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Yeah and stupid babies are too stupid to consent anyway |
|
| ▲ | JKCalhoun 5 days ago | parent | prev [-] |
| Note: user has baby. |
| |