Remix.run Logo
al_borland 5 days ago

This is my #1 issue. I simply don’t trust them and I don’t know that there is a realistic path to build that trust at this point. They’ve been violating my trust for decades.

I’m happy to let them prove out the tech, and if/when a company enters the market with a compelling product that I can trust, I will consider that competing product.

throwoutway 5 days ago | parent | next [-]

OP is taking videos of his baby with these when Meta's page here doesn't event mention data privacy or security of the user's information or how it protects them

vasco 5 days ago | parent | next [-]

All babies look the same, out of anything private you could film by mistake, a baby seems pretty harmless.

dweekly 5 days ago | parent | next [-]

Face recognition is uninuitively good. Google Photos was able to pick out faces from my baby photos pretty easily.

SchemaLoad 5 days ago | parent | next [-]

I was thinking about that a while ago and came to the conclusion that it's likely massively helped out by the narrow search space. They aren't trying to match between every single person, just the ones in your photo library which is an extremely small group compared to what most facial recognition is doing.

KPGv2 5 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Google's face recognition can't tell the difference between my 5yo and my newborn. And, most hilarious, my 8yo could unlock my wife's iPhone with face recognition when she was 2yo.

ramraj07 5 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Google Photos works in a near perfect extremely constrained closed system: your photos have fewer than a hundred faces, it likely biases uncertainties with more confidence due to those constraints.

vasco 5 days ago | parent [-]

Funny because I don't use the feature and in my review tab I have like 15 versions of myself that google thinks are all different people for me to individually name. Mostly different phases of facial hair.

koolala 5 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Custom ads based on your baby facial expressions 15 years later?

jrrv 5 days ago | parent | prev [-]

Really? Mine lumps together completely unrelated people whilst failing to group together the same person.

SXX 5 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Well. Until that film or metadata getting uploaded on Meta servers or checked by some local child-safety AI, getting flagged for inappropriate meterial and police knocking on your door.

lynndotpy 5 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I disagree with your assumption, but you also need to consider that the baby is going to be a person for decades.

latexr 5 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2022/aug/22/google-cs...

jahsome 5 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Yeah and stupid babies are too stupid to consent anyway

JKCalhoun 5 days ago | parent | prev [-]

Note: user has baby.

kevin_thibedeau 5 days ago | parent [-]

Now hammer them with ads designed to guilt trip parents. +1 surveillance capitalism.

frosting1337 5 days ago | parent | prev [-]

Yes, it does, the link to Data & Privacy is at the bottom.

JKCalhoun 5 days ago | parent | prev [-]

> I don’t know that there is a realistic path to build that trust at this point…

I suspect it's impossible as long as Zuckerberg is involved in the company.