▲ | lovich 11 hours ago | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Cool, so did the FCC apply pressure using government power in the attempt to achieve this situation? Yes or no? You don’t need to answer as that’s rhetorical. It’s obvious the answer is yes. Democratic governments try to avoid making public statements like that because the general public cannot tell if it was because of the government or a happy coincidence that the party being pressured just happened to comply. Because it can’t be discerned even the appearance of using government power like that degrades the rule of law | |||||||||||||||||||||||
▲ | kcplate 8 hours ago | parent | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Carr is not “the FCC”. He’s the chairman, but he can’t act unilaterally to remove an affiliate broadcast license. So “the FCC” did not apply pressure, the chairman did. He has a lot of influence and can set the agenda for the commission but he needs a majority of the commissioners to revoke a broadcast license. That is a super rare occurrence and would be unlikely. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
▲ | gertlex 9 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Ok, seems I rubbed the wrong way there; I was not trying to take away from that key point of your post. |