In that case, going by the FCC's complaint against Kimmel, I wonder if my pointing out that Trump furthermore skipped Kirk's vigil to go golfing, is similarly "too offensive to be protected by the first amendment"?

https://people.com/donald-trump-misses-charlie-kirk-vigil-11...

▲

sigwinch 9 minutes ago | parent | next [-]

It was the FCC opportunistically gaining a precedent that they’ll use on other observational hosts. If it wasn’t this, it would have been leaks on Epstein.

▲

Rapzid 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I wouldn't go posting about that under your real name unless you want people pressuring your company to fire you on Twitter..

What a time.

▲

davesque 11 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

By this precedent, it would be!

	▲	dylan604 10 hours ago \| parent [-]
		But mrtesthah has no audience that makes him dangerous to the establishment. He's just a random voice in the wind.