Idk should he be allowed to peddle unhelpful, unsubstantiated conspiracy theories?

Should Fox, Newsmax, OANN, Alex Jones, Tucker, Bannon, the deputy director the the FBI (in a prior gig, to be fair), the president of the United States (current & prior gigs), members of congress, MAGA influencers like Tim Pool, the company paying Tim Pool, the people paying the company that pays Tim Pool, etc, etc, etc, and etc, be allowed to?

▲

rajup 11 hours ago | parent [-]

Good question. Same answer to both. Glad we agree!

▲

amanaplanacanal 9 hours ago | parent [-]

In your view, is that answer yes, or no?

I'd say yes, they all should be. The first amendment demands it.

	▲	rajup an hour ago \| parent [-]
		Sure, yes works for me as long as we're consistent about it.

▲

peterashford 12 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Holy doublestandards, Batman!

▲

cosmicgadget 10 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Saying the shooter was "one of them" has been the most common commentary from both sides. It's inaccurate to call either conclusion a conspiracy.

▲

catlover76 12 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Shouldn't most of Fox News be off the air then? And most podcasts, left or right?

▲

adamredwoods 11 hours ago | parent [-]

Fox news was rightfully sued.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dominion_Voting_Systems_v._Fox...

	▲	kelnos 8 hours ago \| parent [-]
		And what's changed because of it? Nothing?