Remix.run Logo
davesque 12 hours ago

MAGA did, in fact, do their best over the weekend to cast the shooter as anything other than one of them. Comments made in poor taste? Maybe? Not really? No poorer taste than the president saying on Fox & Friends that he "couldn't care less" about promoting unity after the Kirk shooting.

Next point, from NYTimes article covering this: https://www.nytimes.com/2025/09/17/business/media/abc-jimmy-...

"The abrupt decision by the network, which is owned by the Walt Disney Company, came hours after the chairman of the Federal Communications Commission, Brendan Carr, assailed Mr. Kimmel’s remarks and suggested that his regulatory agency might take action against ABC because of them."

So yes, ABC/Nexstar are within their editorial rights to make this decision, but that decision came at an awfully conspicuous time. So what, nothing to see here?

nobody9999 an hour ago | parent | next [-]

>So yes, ABC/Nexstar are within their editorial rights to make this decision, but that decision came at an awfully conspicuous time. So what, nothing to see here?

{Paraphrasing for those who don't get it]

Brendan Carr: That Kimmel guy sure is a pill. Will no one rid me of this meddlesome comic?

Hey ABC, It would be a shame if something bad happened to you guys, wouldn't it? In fact, let's do some investigating to make sure everything is on the up and up, yeah?[0]

ABC: How High?

[0] Right out of the authoritarians' playbook: "For my friends, everything. For my enemies, the law."

typpilol 7 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Free speech doesn't mean freedom from consequences.

rezonant 5 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Free speech doesn't mean freedom from government oppression?

What do you think free speech, the right guaranteed by the Constitution, means?

Rapzid 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

From the government it does. Except for some "unprotected speech" carve outs, it literally does.