I think actually for relatively small n we get cases where mathematics says nope, you can't decide that, the machine goes recursive and so now your decider may be looking at a machine which is itself running deciders and Kurt Gödel says "No".

▲

webstrand 3 days ago | parent [-]

Thanks for the hint to go looking some more. I found that Johannes Riebel has proven that BB(748) is undecidable. So for even small k there may not be deciders for them.

	▲	tialaramex 3 days ago \| parent [-]
		The suspicion is that this happens maybe as early as BB(15). We just can't prove that whereas we can prove BB(745) is not decidable, and, of course, we've decided BB(5) as we see here.