▲ | tekne 4 days ago | |
Umm, signed integers are UB on overflow; unsigned is always fine. | ||
▲ | jbreckmckye 3 days ago | parent [-] | |
Sorry, you are correct. I don't think unsigned overflow behaviour was defined until C99 though. Anyway, in answer to the question, I would guess the reason was because of signed / unsigned type promotion. |