| ▲ | Dagger2 5 days ago |
| Even Mullvad give out ULA addresses. You can hardly call that a proper implementation :( |
|
| ▲ | IlikeKitties 4 days ago | parent | next [-] |
| In Context of a VPN Provider like Mullvad a ULA is required. One of the rare cases where ipv6 nat is a thing. |
| |
| ▲ | Dagger2 4 days ago | parent [-] | | NAT might be a thing in Mullvad's case, but there's no link between that and needing ULA. | | |
| ▲ | IlikeKitties 4 days ago | parent [-] | | Explain because as far as i can tell, to make it impossible for i.e. google to tell me apart from another mullvad user, me and that other user must share the same IP adress. | | |
| ▲ | Dagger2 3 days ago | parent [-] | | You don't need to use ULA addresses to use NAT. You can use any GUA prefix too (preferably one you own or are assigned in some way, rather than squatting on one, to avoid the risk of clashing with someone else). |
|
|
|
|
| ▲ | privacyking 4 days ago | parent | prev [-] |
| Well it's more private. Also there's only one proper IPv6 implementation (using GUAs) and most people.cant get one |
| |
| ▲ | Dagger2 4 days ago | parent [-] | | It's exactly as private as doing the same service with a GUA prefix. Just get a PI block and pick a /64 from it to use instead of whatever ULA prefix they picked at the moment. |
|
