▲ | sputr 2 days ago | |
As someone who's part of a startup (hrpotentials.com) trying to bring truly scientifically valid psychological testing into HR processes .... yeah. We've been at it for almost 7 years, and we're finally at a point where we can say we have something that actually makes scientific sense - and we're not inventing anything new, just commercializing the science! It only took an electrical engineer (not me) with a strong grasp of statistics working for years with a competent professor of psychology to separate the wheat from the chaff. There's some good science there it's just ... not used much. | ||
▲ | obviouslynotme 2 days ago | parent | next [-] | |
How are you going to get around Griggs v. Duke Power Co.? AFAIK, personality tests have not (yet) been given the regulatory eye, but testing cognitive ability has. | ||
▲ | PaulHoule 2 days ago | parent | prev [-] | |
Yeah, this is an era which is notorious for pseudoscience. |