> Source: Hagger et (63!) al. 2016

I can't help chuckling at the idea that over 1.98 * 10^87 people were involved in the paper.

If you were to meet a "normal" person, would you interpret that as meaning "perpendicular" or as meaning "the kind of person that doesn't look at everything like it's a mathematical expression"?

	▲	Terr_ 2 days ago \| parent \| next [-]
		Normal: "The kind of person who doesn't go out of their way to put-down other people on HN for being nerdy when a linked article contains a weird editorial interjection that bears an unusual resemblance to a math expression."
	▲	recursive 2 days ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		Um, actually, the interpretation here is "factorial", not "perpendicular".