It's not about sending a message. It's about making sure you use a service in the way it's being offered, or not using it at all.

▲

mhuffman 5 days ago | parent | next [-]

Well that is not a law, and even bringing it up on a site called "Hacker News" makes me almost think you are making a joke that is going over my head.

▲

nemomarx 5 days ago | parent | prev [-]

YouTube is free to only serve videos to paying users if they don't like ad blockers. it would destroy the site, but they're technically able to do it.

	▲	whatevertrevor 5 days ago \| parent \| next [-]
		It would be really tough. I do think YouTube provides a lot of value by making its videos accessible to everyone. Plenty of closed ecosystem streaming services exist and they continue to be niche things where creators who had no audience before YouTube are trying to keep going. I'm not sure how long the likes of Nebula and Floatplane are going to last honestly, because they have fundamental discovery issues in both directions: The creators need a constant influx of new viewers to replace people growing out of their content, and the viewers need a platform where they can experiment with new content without a big paywall upfront.
	▲	philipallstar 4 days ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		> YouTube is free to only serve videos to paying users if they don't like ad blockers. it would destroy the site, but they're technically able to do it. This is why enshittification exists.