> The Ben & Jerry’s co-founder Jerry Greenfield has stepped away from the ice-cream brand after nearly 50 years, claiming it has lost its independence and accusing its parent company, Unilever, of having “silenced” its social mission.

There is a social mission, and then there is outright political bias. Having a social mission could be climate change, responsible sourcing, charity, etc. But the headline image is a Ben & Jerry's tub with a picture of a political candidate on it.

> Greenfield’s resignation is the latest development in a bitter dispute since Unilever backtracked on an agreement allowing Ben & Jerry’s to not sell ice-cream in occupied Palestinian territories, which had been heavily criticised in Israel.

> Last year, Ben & Jerry’s launched a legal action against Unilever, accusing it of threatening to dismantle the board and sue directors over their public statements in support of Palestinians in Gaza.

At some point you have to ask what ice cream has got to do with Israel and Gaza, no matter where you stand on the issue.

Given the political winds, I think Unilever are acting to protect the brand and their investment, and the co-founders become somewhat increasingly more political.