For the love of God, don't use PureVPN! They have been proven in court to log traffic, despite claiming not to.[1]

[1] https://cyberinsider.com/vpn-logs-lies/

They are one of the few VPN providers that give out public IPv4 addresses, and you can even get a static one. So, if you are using them for having a public IP, not for privacy, please continue doing so.

▲

joecool1029 5 days ago | parent | next [-]

There are better options for that. One of them: https://njal.la/ (this service was formerly known as IPredator and run by former piratebay/piratebyran people)

▲

baobun 4 days ago | parent [-]

FYI: https://xn--gckvb8fzb.com/njalla-has-silently-changed-a-word...

	▲	joecool1029 12 hours ago \| parent [-]
		Good article, know I'm late to circle back but I appreciated it.

▲

lxgr 5 days ago | parent | prev [-]

Interesting, do you know if they actually assign them to the VPN interface (rather than just passing through inbound connections to a public IP to the private IP of the VPN interface)?

That could come in handy for hosting things behind double NAT.

	▲	patrakov 5 days ago \| parent [-]
		They assign it directly to the interface, and letting others connect to stuff behind CGNAT is indeed my use case. Two other VPNs working for this purpose are OVPN (+1 for them using WireGuard, but their Singapore node is slow) and SwissVPN (limited to only 30 Mbps by contract, but they do provide these contracted 30 Mbps).