It is pointless exception. If chat control will pass, everything is vulnerable by design. Or how do you distinguish if WhatsApp is installed on a phone of Joe Nobody or or a phone of a politician? You won't, unless you have some list, which can be leaked and from "do not touch credentials" will turn "target these credentials"

▲

eagleal 3 days ago | parent | next [-]

The exception means legally, that category of people, can't be prosecuted even if incriminating stuff were collected through such channels.

The next logical step, after a prosecutor or political push, would be for the Highest Order Courts of Member countries to invalidate evidence collected through such channels for those categories of people.

	▲	general1465 3 days ago \| parent \| next [-]
		You are looking on it from a wrong perspective. You have access to communications of politicians, military and government apparatus. You can effectively control these figures through extortion (I know about your mistress) or blackmail (I picked up your kids from school today next time I may keep them for a while) Politicians who are pushing these laws are having a feeling that bad things can't happen to them. However they are usually prime targets for bad things happening to them, because they are the ones wielding the power - if you can influence the politician, you can control his power.
	▲	jeltz 3 days ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		Nope, not in Sweden. Anything can be used as evidence here, even illegally obtained stuff.

▲

codeptualize 3 days ago | parent | prev [-]

Haha that’s a good point, I guess another sign that they really have no clue what they are doing