I don’t get the llm shilling. If you think you can earn 50k with some prompts, then earn it. Why _instead_ shill for llms? Feels like stock traders having courses for how YOU could earn big bucks. They themselves have photos taken with one day rented Ferraris…

We all lean on LLMs in one way or another, but HN is becoming infested with wishful prompt engineers. Show, dont tell. Compete on the market instead of yet another PoC.

Uh, sorry?

The bounty here is just $5k, and if you read my comment, I’m suggesting that the maintainer(s), even with LLMs, will likely spend a similar amount in inference + cost of their own time, however they’ll likely produce a solution more robust than what the bounty alone will produce.

To be clear: I’m not advocating that someone simply vibe-codes this up.

That’s already happening (2 PRs when this hit HN), both with negative feedback.

I’m suggesting that the maintainers should give LLM-assisted dev a try here, as they already have context on the Obsidian-side API.

>Feels like stock traders having courses for how YOU could earn big bucks. They themselves have photos taken with one day rented Ferraris…

Do you think the person you are replying to is Sam Altman?