This is probably crazy talk, but I have been wondering how requiring people to slap a stamp on an envelope and mail in a résumé would go.

▲

__turbobrew__ 5 days ago | parent | next [-]

I don’t think it is crazy and I have suggested beforehand there needs to be some sort of proof of work on the candidate side to prevent resume spam.

I think your idea is very elegant as everyone has access to the mail system, an actual stamp is pretty cheap, but it is just enough hassle to mail an application that it will filter out some of the spam.

The other suggestion I have had is that candidates need to hand in the resume in person, but I guess you could accept resumes from both mail and in person drop offs.

▲

pavel_lishin 5 days ago | parent | next [-]

> The other suggestion I have had is that candidates need to hand in the resume in person

This might be a bigger lift than asking for a take-home project; if I'm expected to drop off a resume in Manhattan that's a minimum of a two hour trip for me. I'd rather spend two hours banging together a CRUD app to show that I can actually write code.

	▲	BetaDeltaAlpha 5 days ago \| parent [-]
		I read this as applying to in-office roles, If I were willing to commute, then it's a good chance to exercise the lift required.

▲

lelanthran 4 days ago | parent | prev [-]

> but it is just enough hassle to mail an application that it will filter out some of the spam.

More than that, bots currently have no way of sending snail-mail :-)

▲

obruchez 5 days ago | parent | prev [-]

The only time I had to hire somebody, the university I was working for in Switzerland made it mandatory for the candidates to send their application via mail, not email. That was back in 2014. I found this odd at the time, but I'm pretty sure it made my job way easier (less applications to review, motivated/serious candidates, etc.).