I used to live in this part of the country. There's an insane amount of disregard for the environment and climate. Yes, new buildings have to be reinforced against hurricanes. But they are still building new houses only a few meters above sea level, as if sea level rise wasn't already unavoidable.

And on the largest scale, there is a limit to the amount of fresh groundwater that wells along the South Florida coast can get. Once they exceed that amount, they'll be pumping brackish water seeping in from the ocean. Then they have to desalinate the brackish water.

But the last time I was there, they were still building new houses.

▲

deadbabe 5 days ago | parent | next [-]

“a few meters above sea level” is still not sea level. That’s a good 12-15 feet to work with.

▲

KingMob 5 days ago | parent [-]

Iirc, there are scientific estimates that Greenland's ice sheet alone would raise sea levels by 24 ft if it melted.

12-15 ft may really not be enough for very long.

	▲	deadbabe 4 days ago \| parent \| next [-]
		So let me ask you, is a house really a product meant to last forever and ever, or should it be something that you get maybe 30-40 good years out of it and then dispose it and rebuild? I don’t get this idea where if a building can’t stay in a spot forever, it should not be built at all. Why not build and enjoy while you can? When the land floods it floods, you move on. Until then don’t worry about it.
	▲	Suppafly 4 days ago \| parent \| prev \| next [-]
		Not to mention being 15 ft above sea level doesn't help if the shore keeps washing away. A lot of the houses being moved/abandoned on coasts now are above sea level, but the sea level is undercutting the cliffs they are built on.
	▲	hwc 4 days ago \| parent \| prev \| next [-]
		My parents bought a house 11 feet above sea level. The right combination of high tides and storm surge could easily flood that any time. It hasn't happened yet, but the sea level could rise a foot or so in the next generation, making flooding more likely every year.
	▲	hedora 5 days ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		It’s already probably not enough to weather a 25-100 year storm (looking forward to compute storm frequency).

▲

fijiaarone 5 days ago | parent | prev [-]

How do you feel about Holland?

▲

hedora 5 days ago | parent | next [-]

Holland’s dykes are mostly built on impermeable clay.

As I understand it, that’s not possible in Florida, or at least in places like Miami, where the soil is almost entirely sand.

Holland has been creating progressively better soil surveys since the 1800’s, partially to allow them to place dykes intelligently.

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S00167...

▲

dhussoe 5 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Well.. what’s the level of belief in climate change among elected Dutch leaders?

https://floridaphoenix.com/2024/05/15/desantis-signs-bill-er...

▲

hopelite 5 days ago | parent | prev [-]

I feel that Holland does not have hurricanes.

For context; only the hurricane we have a clear record of had 8.5 meter storm surges. I’m not sure, can the Dutch barriers hold that back?

▲

nicholasbraker 5 days ago | parent | next [-]

The reason why we had something like the Delta works was due to a 12 Bft storm hitting our shores in 1953. This infrastructure is built to withstand these kind of storms and protect the land from flooding. The protections in place (movable doors in storm surge barriers etc.) are used a few times the last decades when storms did hit our shores. I don't know if this is useable in the Florida context. It's easy to say whenever a big hurricane hits the Florida shore: "Yeah, just ask the Dutch to fix this.." And I am sure some smart guys from our tech universities can pull it off, but you need money and political will. And it literally takes decades to built it.

▲

hwc 4 days ago | parent [-]

Also, you need a place to build the dike. Look at a map of Miami, for example, and tell me where you want to build a dike. In front of Miami Beach? And how far does it go? All the way up the coast? There's 120 miles of continuous city on the Atlantic Coast. Also, the land is all very porous sand on top of porous coral. Even if you build a dike out of clay and concrete, water will still seep in from below. This is already happening at high tide.

	▲	hopelite 4 days ago \| parent \| next [-]
		Already happening at high ride? That is not a new phenomenon even though it is played up as as such. Places like St Augustine, Fl or Alexandria, VA; and, although not a city, even Jamestown, Va all have records of regular flooding since their establishment centuries ago and well before the Industrial Revolution during strong king tides when you get a confluence of effects like the moon and the sun’s tidal forces amplifying each other, rains have swelled waterways and saturated ground, and the fact that they are situated and basically at water level. I’ve experienced it personally in a few places, ands considering that those places built a long time ago clearly have structures built to accommodate strong king tides is an indicator to me that they knew it happens every once and a while even before the Industrial Revolution.
	▲	hollerith 4 days ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		Usually low-lying areas protected by dikes also deploy large pumps to pump out water that does get in. My guess is that it would be cost prohibitive to keep on pumping the water back out of Miami in 2075, but that is just a guess. There are probably people who know for sure, and it would be nice to read what they have to say.

▲

KaiserPro 4 days ago | parent | prev [-]

1953 was 5.6m above mean sea levels.

but parts of the Netherlands are -3 below sea level, it kinda evens out.

I think the other point to mention is that there isn't one barrier, there are a fuck load of them. (https://nltimes.nl/2024/09/03/tech-failure-nearly-caused-mas... but they also need to be close to work....)