▲ | LanceJones 3 days ago | ||||||||||||||||||||||
My Model Y in Vancouver drives me to and from work daily. I cannot get a Waymo here -- and I certainly cannot purchase one privately. Which is more effective where I live? | |||||||||||||||||||||||
▲ | Workaccount2 3 days ago | parent | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Teslas have a ~about 500 miles between interventions (they don't release actual data, no surprise), whereas Waymo is at around 17,000 miles. That's a 34x divide. At full scale that's something like 30% of Teslas having an intervention every day. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
▲ | dagenix 3 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||
You are supposed to supervise Tesla FSD. Waymo doesn't require someone in the driver's seat at all. They aren't the same thing. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
▲ | sashank_1509 3 days ago | parent | prev [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||
We’ve also not seen how capable Tesla is at evasive maneuvers. We have plenty of videos (hundreds now) of Waymo making instant swerves to avoid children running onto the road, cars running red lights, a person falling from a Scooty etc. These are not maneuvers you would expect from a human, which shows how Waymo has pretty successfully crossed the human bar in safety. If Tesla does not demonstrate this, on top of driving normally, I don’t think they have a product. The barrier to give control to a computer is super human not human like driving. Also philosophically I don’t see how a big neural network will create such evasive maneuvers, unless you try to create such scenarios in a simulator and collect evasive data. Seems prohibitively expensive to do so in the real world. |