Hello everyone. This is Adrienne Rockenhaus (the "OP" from the Reddit post). I've been reading this discussion, and I want to provide some clarity and address the main points being raised, with links to the public record.

The discussion here has focused heavily on the original 2014 CFAA charge. But the current, life-threatening crisis is happening in Michigan, and it's based on a series of supervised release violations that were provably manufactured.

The warrant lists five violations. Here is the truth for each:

"Lost Contact/Absconder": This is a lie. My husband was hospitalized in a VA facility for a mental health crisis, and we have text messages proving the probation office knew his exact whereabouts.

"New Credit": This was identity theft, for which we filed a formal police report. The probation office tried to punish him for being the victim of a crime.

"Unauthorized iPhone": The phone was his authorized work device, issued by me, his formally approved employer (approved by his former PO in writing).

"Failed Restitution": He was paying the amount agreed upon with his first PO. We have the government's own receipts to prove it.

"Cannabis Use": A misleading omission. He has a legal prescription for Marinol for his combat-related PTSD, which the probation office knew would cause a positive test.

Regarding the Texas case, the real issue is not the details of the decade-old charge; it's the corrupt process the government used:

Pretext: The charge was revived just before the statute of limitations expired, and only after my husband refused to help the FBI decrypt traffic from his Tor exit node.

Perjury: His 3-year pretrial detention was secured by the perjured testimony of a U.S. Probation Officer who lied about what a "SPICE graphics driver" is. The FBI agent never corrected this lie on the record.

Collusion: The entire hearing was tainted. We have documented proof that his own defense attorney at the time was actively colluding with his ex-wife to sabotage the case.

This is not about whether you approve of his past actions. This is about whether the government should be allowed to use pretext, perjury, and conspiracy to jail a citizen. The core principle is that everyone is entitled to due process. He did not receive it.

Please do not take my word for it, and do not take the word of anonymous commenters.

Read the primary source documents for yourself. The fraudulent warrants, the court transcript proving the perjury, and the evidence of the conspiracy are all on the public record at rockenhaus.com.