Ah, so if a Tesla feature is bad it must have been designed by Musk.

And if Tesla does something good it was "obviously not from only one person"

> I have posted similar strong compliments/defenses of Musk in the past, including on here.

As have many people, who curiously seemed to change their treatment of Musk around the time of the 2024 election. Funny, that.

▲

toss1 3 hours ago | parent | next [-]

No, I did NOT say the safety features were not due to Musk, I stated clearly I believe he was responsible for that safety initiative, just as I thought him responsible for the door handles, but I doubt he had much input in the detailed design of either, and OBVIOUSLY the design of a whole modern automotive crash safety system is more than the work of one person.

More importantly, the juxtaposition of the two features makes clear his motivation is primarily a collection of features that Musk thinks will make Musk seem cool, which is a very different thing than trying to make the safest cars in all respects to protect his customers.

As for when and why my opinion of Musk changed, again it changed years before 2024, and was cemented when he argued publicly with one of his software engineers and revealed a level of cluelessness showing his previous reputation as some kind of tech genius was a curated sham.

You seem to suggest it is wrong of people to reconsider their opinion of Musk around 2024 when he claims to be a "Free Speech Absolutist" yet used his ownership of the largest social media platform and his massive fortune to actively promote proto-fascists in the US and around the world to convert democracies into racist authoritarian states.

It is not wrong to shun people who work to introduce intolerance into a society — in fact, the only thing that an open tolerant society can not tolerate if it wants to survive is intolerance itself [0]. While I was not one of them, I am perfectly happy to see people changing their opinion of Musk due to his actions around 2024. If you have not, you are not looking closely enough; please do so.

[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paradox_of_tolerance

▲

cbeach 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

> proto-fascists in the US and around the world to convert democracies into racist authoritarian states.

I think you've said enough to prove my point.

	▲	toss1 35 minutes ago \| parent [-]
		The only point being demonstrated here is that you fail to see the explicitly authoritarian actions of the parties Musk supports in the US (Republicans), Germany (AfD), Hungary (Fidesz), etc., and do not understand that in democracies the branches of government (legislative, judicial, executive), and the institutions of society (press, academy, finance, industry, sport, religion, social) are all independent. In contrast authoritarians coerce or corrupt these institutions to serve the executive. If you can't see those authoritarian actions by the parties Musk supports, you are either willfully ignorant or just plain obtuse, or a willing authoritarian proto-fascist. And no, your point is still wrong; there is nothing wrong with changing ones opinion of a public figure when he comes out supporting authoritarianism