What I find interesting is how much opinions vary on this. Open a different thread and people will seem to have consensus on GPT or Gemini being superior.

Even the bench marks don’t seem all that helpful.

▲

TuxSH 2 days ago | parent | next [-]

Well, last I checked Claude's webchat UI doesn't have LaTeX rendering for output messages which is extremely annoying.

On the other hand, I wish ChatGPT had GitHub integration in Projects, not just in Codex.

I've also had Claude Sonnet 4.0 Thinking spew forth incorrect answers many times for complex problems involving some math (with incapability to write a former proof sometimes), whereas ChatGPT 5 Thinking gives me correct answers with formal proof.

▲

kissgyorgy 2 days ago | parent | prev [-]

I think it depends on the domain. For example, GPT-5 is better for frontend, React code, but struggles with niche things like Nix. Claude's UI designs are not as pretty as GPT-5's.

	▲	omneity 2 days ago \| parent \| next [-]
		This is also pretty subjective. I’m a power user of both and tend to prefer Claude’s UI about 70-80% of the time. I often would use Claude to do a “make it pretty” pass after implementation with GPT-5. I find Claude’s spatial and visual understanding when dealing with frontend to be better. I am sure others will have the exact opposite experience.
	▲	gunalx 2 days ago \| parent \| prev \| next [-]
		My experience is exactly opposite. Claude excelling in ui, and react. While gpt5 being better on really niche stuff, migth just be me better at caching when gpt5 halucinates as opposed to the claude4 hallucinations. But after openai started gatekeeping all their new decent models in the api, i will happily refuse to buy more credits, and rather use foss models from other providers (I wish claude had proper no log policies).
	▲	boredtofears 2 days ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		This is what I mean - even opinions on domain are wildly different. I've seen people say Claude's React is best.