Remix.run Logo
cddotdotslash 2 hours ago

I wonder who actually discovered this attack? Can we credit them? The phrasing in these posts is interesting, with some taking direct credit and others just acknowledging the incident.

Aikido says: > We were alerted to a large-scale attack against npm...

Socket says: > Socket.dev found compromised various CrowdStrike npm packages...

Ox says: > Attackers slipped malicious code into new releases...

Safety says: > The Safety research team has identified an attack on the NPM ecosystem...

Phoenix says: > Another supply chain and NPM maintainer compromised...

Semgrep says: > We are aware of a number of compromised npm packages

advocatemack an hour ago | parent | next [-]

Mackenzie here I work for Aikido. This is a classic example of the security community all playing a part. The very first notice of this was from a developer named Daniel Pereira. He alerted Socket who did the first review of the Malware and discovered 40 packages. After, Aikido discovered an additional 147 packages and the Crowdstrike packages. I'm not sure how Step found it but they were the first to really understand the malware and that it was a self replicating worm. So multiple parties all playing a part kinda independent. Its pretty cool

jamesberthoty 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Several individual developers seem to have noticed it at around the same time with Step and Socket pointing to different people in their blogs.

And then vendors from Socket, Aikido, and Step all seem to have detected it via their upstream malware detection feeds - Socket and Aikido do AI code analysis, and Step does eBPF monitoring of build pipelines. I think this was widespread enough it was noticed by several people.

m4r71n 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Since so many vendors discovered these packages seemingly independently, you'd think that they would share those mechanisms with NPM itself so that those packages would never be published in the first place. But I guess that removes their ability to sell an "early alert" mechanism through their offerings...

progbits an hour ago | parent [-]

NPM is owned by github/microsoft. I'm sure they could afford to buy one of these products or just build their own, but clearly security is not a thing they care about.

codazoda an hour ago | parent | next [-]

Somehow I didn't realize GitHub purchased npm in 2020. GitHub is the second word on npmjs.org. How did I not notice?

octo888 29 minutes ago | parent [-]

Microsoft: GitHub, NPM, typescript, VS Code, OpenAI, Playwright

A lot of fingers in a lot pies

foobarbecue 37 minutes ago | parent | prev [-]

Can't help noticing, in the original article:

> The entire attack design assumes Linux or macOS execution environments, checking for os.platform() === 'linux' || 'darwin'. It deliberately skips Windows systems

If I were the conspiracy-minded sort I might jump to some wild conclusions here.

augzodia 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

OP article says: > The incident was discovered by @franky47, who promptly notified the community through a GitHub issue.

codazoda an hour ago | parent [-]

Points to this, which does look like the first mention.

https://github.com/scttcper/tinycolor/issues/256

an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-]
[deleted]
Onavo 22 minutes ago | parent | prev [-]

Usually security companies monitor CVEs and the security mailing lists. That's how they all end up releasing the blog posts at the same time. It's because they are all using the same primary source.