▲ | blobbers a day ago | |
It looks more like C++ or C now. Never really became a java programmer. Hopefully never will have to. | ||
▲ | fhd2 a day ago | parent [-] | |
Back in 2005 or so, Java felt like "C++, but we know better" to me. I had no choice but to use it, but boy did they omit some stuff that was actually useful. The boilerplate back then (driven by both the limitations of the language and a surge in architecture astronauts) was absolutely insane. Don't even get me started on anything labelled "Java Enterprise" in the 2000s, bloat, slowness and bugs everywhere. IBM, Oracle and friends were running quite the circus. Creating working, performant software in that environment was a brutal challenge. I think Java, the language, is only partly to blame, but it was limited enough to spawn pretty complex code generators and frameworks. Took the industy a decade or two to arrive at typed languages that were an actually good subset of C++ features. Java, in my opinion, wasn't one. |