Then why dont you pick jquery?

Its easy and well known, even now.

The answer I see is that react is technically good enough.

Using boring technology doesnt mean using the technically most advanced thing.

It means picking something safe and stable.

Why would you need jquery today? What can it do that native browser APIs can't?

Jquery is the old default for web apps from before people decided they wanted react.

What can it do that others cant? Literally nothing.

That didnt and does not stop it from being used for connivence sake.

The point is: if its not about the technical quality; why are we not still using it now?

	▲	zelphirkalt 5 hours ago \| parent [-]
		If that is the point, then I feel it is made out of technical mediocrity, rather than excellence. A good team should be able to adapt the technology that best fits the task, and companies should be able to hire for it. Or stay mediocre otherwise. The hiring issue is home made. If companies started hiring for engineering skills, rather than familiarity with existing tech stack, it would change quickly. Experienced engineers are able to learn new languages and frameworks on the job. Of course, if hiring is too petty to give engineers a month of getting familiar with the product and expect readiness from the get go, then they will continue to miss out on talent.

Jquery didn't provide anything that you couldn't already do with native browser APIs, it was a wrapper around those APIs.

MisterSandman 12 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

React is significantly more easier to hire for than JQuery is, especially in this market. Especially if you’re looking for more junior roles.

As a new grad, I would’ve picked a react job over a JQuery job even if the JQuery one paid me 10k more.

isqueiros 9 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

maintaining a large jquery/native js codebase vs a react one is not even in the same ballpark.

even when not being opinionated react foundationally has more structure for complex code.