|
| ▲ | ptx 4 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| If I recall correctly, Bada was already more locked down from the start, with app distribution only permitted with Samsung's approval. Otherwise I would have been interested in trying a Bada phone. |
|
| ▲ | joshdavham 13 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Interesting! > Long story short: it's not something the market wants. Who knows. Maybe this could change? |
| |
| ▲ | numpad0 8 hours ago | parent [-] | | The market HAD changed to what it is now from what it was. Most handheld manufacturers had garbage mobile app platforms back in 2007. Something happened in January of that year and they all started coughing blood. |
|
|
| ▲ | like_any_other 11 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| > it's not something the market wants. If it was just "the market" guiding things, there would be no need to lock things down against consumers, or pulling bait-and-switches with slowly closing down the previously open-source Android, would there? Please learn to recognize when you are under attack. |
|
| ▲ | j45 11 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| The market doesn't care what it's coded in, its just about end user convenience and usability. Android is Linux based, and so is iOS. They focused on the UX and what it took. It leaves it possible for linux to do it again. |
| |
| ▲ | SahAssar 7 hours ago | parent [-] | | Android does not use what we normally call a linux userspace. iOS is not at all linux based, although it is UNIX-like. |
|
