▲ | mhuffman 19 hours ago | ||||||||||||||||
Useful project. Name that no reasonable company would allow IT department to use. 10 out of 10! It worked for CockroachDB. I hope it turns into a unicorn and I'm not joking about that. | |||||||||||||||||
▲ | another-dave 19 hours ago | parent | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||
I can't remember what the package was, but when I was working for "large bank", one of the npm dependencies we wanted to use had a licence file that just said 'Do whatever the fuck you want'. Legal came back saying that it was "highly unorthodox, but approved for use" | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
▲ | spacebanana7 19 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||
I believe people chose to pay Adobe subscriptions simply to avoid explaining the acronym for the GNU Image Manipulation Program in meetings. | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
▲ | chillfox 18 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||
I have never worked at or heard of a company caring about the names of software, at most it's been a bit of a chuckle. Best guess is being concerned about software names is a super conservative culture thing. | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
▲ | catlifeonmars 16 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | ||||||||||||||||
The cockroachDB thing, was that intentional or just incidental? |