> service people depend on

why wouldn't you cap a free service? imo it's more irresponsible to demand other people keep a thing you don't pay for running just because you happen to depend on it.

Just because a service doesn't require direct payment doesn't mean that its users shouldn't have any expectations of availability. There should be fair usage limits, of course, even if the service is commercial, but being caught by surprise by a traffic surge and boasting that it runs on underpowered hardware when the project is 10+ years old is irresponsible IMO.

Also, any service can have a financial purpose, even if it's "free" for users. This very forum is "free", yet the cost of hosting it is indirectly paid for by being an ad for the company that runs it. HN also famously runs on underpowered hardware that routinely fails to meet demand, but that is beside the point.