| ▲ | reaperducer a day ago | ||||||||||||||||||||||
If you use this CSS liquid glass effect in your app, Apple will reject it from the App Store. Citation needed. The blog article speculates this, but there is no proof. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | pupatlas 21 hours ago | parent | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Here you go: > Apple App Review Guidelines: 2.5.1 Apps may only use public APIs and must run on the currently shipping OS. https://developer.apple.com/app-store/review/guidelines/ And here's the (private) field that needs to be enabled on your webview to enable the CSS property. Otherwise (according to the author) it's just ignored: https://github.com/WebKit/WebKit/blob/613c42873c56e2b2073f91... | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | wahnfrieden a day ago | parent | prev [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||
If you are ignorant to Apple rules and practices, please don't be obnoxious about it. Apple has developer guidelines for the App Store, and they say you cannot use private APIs! They do not publish any "proof" to cite beyond what they write there. And they interpret and enforce the rules at their own whim. The private API is here: https://github.com/WebKit/WebKit/blob/613c42873c56e2b2073f91... it's on WKWebView and resembles other private APIs they forbid access to Apple absolutely does reject apps for using private APIs. Here is a famous case where they started rejecting Electron apps for private API use: https://9to5mac.com/2019/11/04/electron-app-rejections/ You are welcome to sit and wait for Apple to publish proof that this new private API is just like the others but you shouldn't bother others demanding they cite it for you when clarification will not come for this particular API and there is already precedence on how they handle it categorically. You also shouldn't spread false confidence that it's OK to use these APIs due to lack of "proof" which meets your own standards when it can and has resulted not only in apps being removed but also threat of developer accounts being terminated. (Even if this is rare.) I understand it can be confusing: they don't do it consistently and they change their enforcement of it over time as they please. Even when it's not done automatically, they can and have inspected closely "by hand" if they are looking for a reason to punish. It is a liability. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||