Remix.run Logo
this2shallPass a day ago

I hadn't heard of them either so I checked online. I usually check Media Bias / Fact Check and AllSides when I encounter a news source with which I'm not familiar.

1. Media Bias / Fact Check:

Funded by / Ownership

The Cradle lacks transparency as it does not disclose who owns it. Revenue is generated through donations.

Analysis / Bias

The Cradle’s content frequently opposes Israeli policies and Western geopolitical stances, particularly focusing on West Asian politics. Articles often critique far-right Israeli politicians and highlight regional issues from a perspective that challenges mainstream Western narratives. Articles and headlines often use loaded emotional language in opposition to Israeli policy like this Cracks deepen in Israel as opposition head issues ‘ultimatum’ to Netanyahu. This story is correctly sourced from the Times of Israel and Haaretz.

Editorially, The Cradle consistently frames Israel negatively with stories such as this On Israel and rape. While this article is sourced properly from credible sources, it is entirely one-sided in focusing on Israel. When reporting on the United States, they often report negatively on President Joe Biden like this ‘Biden has the blood of innocent people on his hands’: Former US official.

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/the-cradle-bias-and-credibili...

2. AllSides:

The Cradle Rated Lean Left in January 2024 Independent Review

An independent AllSides reviewer opted to give The Cradle an initial rating of Lean Left.

While it demonstrated a clear opposition to Israel and the West, The Cradle did not appear to weigh in on other topics relevant to right-left U.S. politics. Site searches for "liberal," "conservative," "right-wing," and "left-wing" yielded few results.

https://www.allsides.com/news-source/cradle-media-bias

Dilettante_ a day ago | parent [-]

Thanks ChatGPT.

Edit: Parent edited their comment and added their sources.

this2shallPass a day ago | parent | next [-]

Google, but you're welcome.

rolph a day ago | parent [-]

any AI by another name, would smell just as pungent.

JumpCrisscross a day ago | parent | prev [-]

It looked like AI slop, but if you click through, they’re actually quoting their sources verbatim. (No clue how the source compiles its ratings, however.)

Dilettante_ a day ago | parent [-]

In my defence, the sources were not mentioned in the comment when I made my reply, only the very LLM-looking text excerpts.