> It, too, would benefit from becoming Rust.

Yet it was created for Python. Someone took that effort and did it. No one took that effort in Rust. End of the story of crab's superiority.

Python community is constantly creating new, great, highly usable packages that become de facto industry standards, and maintain old ones for years, creating tutorials, trainings and docs. Commercial vendors ship Python APIs to their proprietary solutions. Whereas Rust community is going through forums and social media telling them that they should use Rust instead, or that they "cheated" because those libraries are really C/C++ libraries (and BTW those should be done in Rust as well, because safety).