▲ | lordleft 5 hours ago | ||||||||||||||||||||||
This reminds me of the thought of Isaiah Berlin, political philosopher and historian of ideas; utopian philosophies often conclude that there if there is a "right" way to live, i.e. a maximally rational way of life, then utopia will consist of everyone converging on this lifestyle. For a certain type of person, this monistic vision of life annihilates pluralism, optionality, and genuine diversity. Berlin himself espoused value pluralism, the idea that there are an infinite number of fundamental human values and ideals for which once can be deeply committed but can also be at conflict and mutually exclusive with one another. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
▲ | TheOtherHobbes 5 hours ago | parent [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||
That's unconvincing, because there's a very clear difference between a lifestyle and a social contract. Social contracts sketch social relationships in very broad terms. You can still have plenty of lifestyle diversity and plurality within them. In fact you need a social contract to have any kind of diversity. Otherwise a culture reliably degenerates into autocracy, which isn't known for its tolerance. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|