▲ | dpassens a day ago | |
And why does the linked paper not qualify as such a link? | ||
▲ | whyandgrowth a day ago | parent | next [-] | |
P.S. Sorry, I was wrong. | ||
▲ | whyandgrowth a day ago | parent | prev [-] | |
Good point. I just thought that a direct link or summary of the formal reasoning would have made it easier for readers unfamiliar with the topic. But fair enough, the linked paper does cover it. |