Define "right-wing".

Ultimately either the evidence is correct or it's not, no matter how it's funded. This documentary demonstrates how much of the current mainstream evidence is in fact incorrect, explains why it's incorrect (both the errors and the incentives involved) and then provides evidence for why the small degree of measured warming over the last decades is both happening perfectly naturally and is not very significant compared to periods in the history of mankind.

You must at least admit that much of the evidence backing the climate "crisis" we have been fed over the last decades was actually just projections from models. Models that have generally been proven to be completely wrong. If you take a look for real evidence of detrimental effects from any change in the climate, it's simply not there.

In which case I'd appreciate seeing something in text form, since the first ten minutes is uncompelling and does not demonstrate what you say it does, and I'm not inclined to spend much time verifying my suspicions. Another commenter has linked to a review (here [0]) which demonstrates that graphs have been used in a totally misleading way in the film. Indeed this is exactly the sort of thing that makes 1hr+ films a big red flag for me.

[0] https://www.lse.ac.uk/granthaminstitute/news/fake-graphs-and...