| ▲ | mpweiher a day ago | |
[nuclear license to print money] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cbeJIwF1pVY "Jetzt müssen RWE und Co. die ausgedienten Gelddruckmaschinen sicher abwickeln." But that was the well-known pro nuclear lobby group...greenpeace. https://www.greenpeace.de/klimaschutz/energiewende/atomausst... "Atomkraftwerke sind Gelddruckmaschinen." But that was the well-known pro nuclear lobbyist...Jürgen Trittin https://www.presseportal.de/pm/57706/1010574 Anyway, you are just regurgitating the same old counter-factual nonsense as before, and the irrelevant "but China is also building renewables". Once again: nuclear and renewables are only a contradiction in the minds of anti-nuclear advocates. Industrial nations do both. > Plan to build 6 then 8 more EPR2 → "only a plan" That is incorrect. As stated before, the approvals are being sought, 3 sites have been selected and multi-billion € contracts have been awarded. > Sites have been selected for the first 6 https://world-nuclear-news.org/articles/bugey-chosen-to-host... > [engineering contracts] → long road ahead Newsflash: yes, nuclear power plants are big. Once again: if multi-billion contracts are "nothing", please give some of that "nothing". I will send you my bank details. Apologies about pointing at Mitterand, that was incorrect. I meant Hollande. https://www.ewmagazine.nl/kennis/achtergrond/2022/10/bernard... Translation: 'Green cabal paralyzes the nuclear industry’ https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ePZUamAzNA4IzdR1dlkE2wtl... | ||
| ▲ | natmaka 12 hours ago | parent [-] | |
You quote assertions. It doesn't proves anything about the nuclear industry. An indictment must specify who did what, when, and with what effect. > the irrelevant "but China is also building renewables". No, I state the fact: China is building WAY, WAY MORE renewables than nuclear. > nuclear and renewables are only a contradiction in the minds of anti-nuclear advocates. Industrial nations do both. They try to do nuclear (with meager effects) just like many of them do coal: inertia, political pressure... >> Plan to build 6 then 8 more EPR2 → "only a plan" > That is incorrect. As stated before, the approvals are being sought, 3 sites have been selected and multi-billion € contracts have been awarded. Here, also, only acts prove anything. Everything started in 2022 and, 3 years later, only one site preparation project has begun. >> Sites have been selected for the first 6 > https://world-nuclear-news.org/articles/bugey-chosen-to-host... "Selected" is far from "nuclear-specific work is in order"! > Apologies about pointing at Mitterand, that was incorrect. I meant Hollande. Which action of F. Hollande did hurt the nuclear sector? Not a single one! No, not Fessenheim (French ahead, AFAIK a software translator does the job): https://sites.google.com/view/electricitedefrance/accueil#h.... > Translation: 'Green cabal paralyzes the nuclear industry’ The interviewee, Bernard Accoyer, does not make any specific accusations; it is a conspiracy theory. He is well-known for this in France. | ||