▲ | snailmailman 2 days ago | |||||||
is this specific page supposed to show as revoked? its not showing as revoked for me in firefox, but https://revoked.badssl.com/ does so i know my browser is doing revocation checking. I'm curious whats happening here. | ||||||||
▲ | zephyreon 2 days ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||
This loads fine in Safari on iOS 26 lol. | ||||||||
| ||||||||
▲ | tsimionescu 2 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||
revoked.badssl.com is showing up for me in Firefox on mobile just fine, so perhaps there is some nondeterminism here in some way? To be fair, this would be even more bizarre... | ||||||||
▲ | lucumo 2 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||
Interestingly Chrome 140.0.7339.51 on Android 16 blocks it with a net::ERR_CERT_REVOKED error. I always thought Chrome didn't block them and that revocation was pretty much dead. | ||||||||
| ||||||||
▲ | mholt a day ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||
This page is to demonstrate that revocation is broken. There is no central revocation authority. Anyone can publish a revocation list, whether it's a CA or client vendors or Joe from his mom's basement. I'm using the term "revocation list" loosely, as it can be as simple as a list of public keys to distrust. Client software can use any revocation list they want, AFAIK. | ||||||||
▲ | prirai 2 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||
The certificate expiry is Dec 2025 so it's valid. | ||||||||
▲ | 2 days ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||
[deleted] |