The MPAA's argument against this bill is a complete joke:

>MPA urged state lawmakers to reject Wicks’ bill this week in a letter, obtained by POLITICO, claiming device-based age checks may sow confusion; for example, if parents and kids had separate Netflix profiles under one account that’s logged in on multiple devices.

To the point where I'm asking if someone needs some token opposition to frame this obvious bill a political win?

There are legitimate arguments that can be made against this bill...that is not one of them.