▲ | ghaff a day ago | ||||||||||||||||||||||
>Counterpoint: buying is always better, people just can't afford it. >Renting has it's charm for youngsters You're sort of contradicting yourself. So long as you think you're sort of settled in an area, buying is probably better. But, if it's your first job out of school, even if you have a nice bunch of money you could put towards a down payment, it's not clear that buying is a great idea except maybe if you're in an area with lots of jobs for your chosen profession. Once I bought, somewhat belatedly, I was in an area that offered enough possibilities in my (broadly speaking) field even if a couple commutes were on the long side. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
▲ | cramsession a day ago | parent | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||
If you're young and you buy, you could get roommates and have them pay rent. That would definitely tilt the benefits heavily to buying. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
▲ | zeroq a day ago | parent | prev [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Not really. If it's viable for you then buy your first property as soon as possible and keep saving. When you want to move just buy another and rent the previous one. In most cases people will need to get a half decent job and save for a few years first but they can keep saving and have enough for another property in few years. And if you really have to move - then you can still sell that property. People are getting new cars every 2-3 years and it's not that different from swapping real estate. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|