▲ | testdelacc1 2 days ago | |||||||
That's a fair point, but different arguments work with different audiences. For what it's worth, they're not making up the CSAM thing. It has never been easier to disseminate/acquire CSAM in a way that you're never caught. That wasn't really possible before, which means there's a larger market for the production of such material. I didn't bring up CSAM here because HN is militantly against think-of-the-children arguments. | ||||||||
▲ | pydry 2 days ago | parent [-] | |||||||
The UK Labour government is one government particularly in favor of tapping all communications "for the sake of the children". It turned out this week that they knowingly hired the "best friend" of famous pedophile as ambassador to the US. >I didn't bring up CSAM here because HN is militantly against think-of-the-children arguments. All consent manufacturing arguments promoting mass surveillance and backdoors are disingenuous to the very core. Im surprised you dont see it. | ||||||||
|