|
| ▲ | vasac 2 days ago | parent | next [-] |
| Stasi wasn't doing it for the money anyway. |
| |
| ▲ | JumpCrisscross 2 days ago | parent | next [-] | | That’s what I mean. This honestly looks more like right-wing elements more than commercial lobbying. Doubly suspicious when the unsubstantiated claim is the bogeyman du jour. | | |
| ▲ | bboygravity 2 days ago | parent [-] | | What right wing elements?! Almost all of the EU (both at the EU level and member state level) is dominated by self proclaimed socialist parties or coalitions and has been for decades. The push for spying was always there and immediately became worse right after the Snowden revelations more than a decade ago. Your comment makes 0 sense. | | |
| ▲ | anthk 2 days ago | parent [-] | | What if I told you that the far right wants the same. |
|
| |
| ▲ | 2 days ago | parent | prev [-] | | [deleted] |
|
|
| ▲ | Quekid5 2 days ago | parent | prev [-] |
| It was redacted ... and very obviously so. Did you read my post? |
| |
| ▲ | JumpCrisscross 2 days ago | parent | next [-] | | Attendees can hint at money. But it isn’t money. The lack of transparency is problematic per se. But it doesn’t advance your argument that the redacted groups are the ones you suspect. | | |
| ▲ | Quekid5 2 days ago | parent [-] | | I take your point. There were some previous leaked docs about Thorn involvement (I'm pretty sure Palantir was mentioned in those docs, but not 100% sure), so yeah... The biggest issue is the lack of transparency about the people/groups involved in those meetings and why this ineffectual privacy-destroying idiocy gets pushed so hard. |
| |
| ▲ | 2 days ago | parent | prev [-] | | [deleted] |
|
