> You cannot point out logical flaws anymore.

What logical flaws have you found in the math of the big bang or white holes?

The article has no math. In my opinion this makes the level of discourse low.

The other commenter wrote that I dont know the math and that "math can be learned from books".

For me quality of comments is even lower than the quality of the article...

Have a nice day

	▲	ants_everywhere 3 days ago \| parent [-]
		Well certainly the quality of your comments is very low. You're just repeating low-effort anti-science rhetoric. You're implying that people can't handle your brilliant understanding of logical flaws, but you've given no evidence that you even understand the basics. Since you're writing low quality conspiratorial comments, people are assuming you're just as uninformed as your comments imply. You keep trying to imply that you know more than everybody else and are just unwilling to show it. So if you have something to say to add to the conversation then now would be the time to do so. Otherwise we'll go on assuming you are just confused.