Remix.run Logo
zug_zug a day ago

I understand this may look dismissive or blamey, but sometimes (actually a shocking amount) there aren’t equal merits to both sides…

I’ve looked into this a lot and there isn’t any strong argument I’ve seen that this is good for humanity, and let’s not pretend every political action is a sincere attempt to improve the world for all equally.

If you look into all the abuse heaped upon the man who discovered leaded gasoline was bad it helps give context on just how far some people will go for their own profits.

throwaway173738 21 hours ago | parent [-]

Or the companies selling cigarettes. The only positive is that cigarettes alleviate the stress caused by being addicted to cigarettes.

yndoendo 21 hours ago | parent [-]

There is also a social water cooler like aspect. Historically brakes were only provided to those that smoke so people took up smoking so they could get a brake. Some companies still follow this asinine ideology and do not provide brakes to non-smokers.

teddyh 21 hours ago | parent | next [-]

(You mean “break”, not “brake”.)

yndoendo 18 hours ago | parent [-]

Yes, unable to edit to fix typos.

And no I do not condone smoking. It was to point out system design flaws in the business world.

DoctorOetker 21 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

So without smokers, there wouldn't be any workers rights at all?