▲ | JSR_FDED 3 days ago | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Comparing IRIX 4DWM desktop to the Canon Cat is like saying you prefer the UI on your washing machine. Among workstations SGI was light years ahead - the engineering team had designers in it, and it shows. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
▲ | spankibalt 3 days ago | parent [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
> Comparing IRIX 4DWM desktop to the Canon Cat is like saying you prefer the UI on your washing machine. Equation (as opposed to comparison) and preference are two very different things, friend. And yes, I'm one of those weirdos who prefers minimal, low-color, high-res, high-contrast, and angular/facetted (almost brutalist) GUIs and TUIs to, say, SGIs offerings. Like the Canon Cat's and many others. We'll both live. > [...] the engineering team had designers in it, and it shows. The GUI is not as grotten ugly to me as those from most modern offerings, or certain vintage offenders, e. g. early-to-mid Workbench, Windows XP (excluding the Classic Theme), I'll give you that. But it certainly doesn't knock me out of my socks. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|