| ▲ | haitchfive 2 days ago |
| Just logged in to downvote this anti-scientific garbage.
Who allows this garbage to propagate via feeds? Ignore the OP, pay attention to actual science, and why safety measures matter: https://www.reuters.com/science/nasa-rover-finds-potential-s... https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2025/09/10/life-on... |
|
| ▲ | MarkusQ 2 days ago | parent | next [-] |
| You are totally missing the part about rocks from Mars reaching Earth all the time. If it were an issue, it is already too late. Plus, we have already brought back samples from other bodies with out bothering with such precautions. Also, nothing in scientific findings (nor in the popular press articles you cited as "science") suggests that this is anything other than mineral traces of life that has been dead for millions (more likely billions) of years. Finally, you may want to drop the ranting tone if you expect anyone to take you seriously. |
| |
| ▲ | verzali 2 days ago | parent | next [-] | | It's not quite the same. Any Mars rock that reaches us naturally has likely spent millions of years in the vacuum of space and then been heated to very high temperatures as it falls through the atmosphere. | |
| ▲ | TheCraiggers 2 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Obviously we don't want ancient Mars viruses or whatever killing us all. But we also don't want to contaminate the samples with Earth-stuff. | | |
| ▲ | theragra a day ago | parent [-] | | Afaik it is very unlikely anything from mars can affect us in any way. All our bacteria and viruses have millions of years of coevolution. Best example is how almost all cat and dog infections do not affect humans. And cats and dogs are mammals! | | |
| ▲ | TheCraiggers a day ago | parent [-] | | Sure, but you missed my entire point, which was we don't want to contaminate the samples. The entire point is looking for evidence of life and organic material. Would be a shame to spend all those billions just to not be sure if the organic material we're looking at came from Earth or Mars. | | |
| ▲ | hyperhello a day ago | parent [-] | | Wouldn’t we be able to tell under an electron microscope? | | |
| ▲ | IAmBroom 8 hours ago | parent [-] | | Short answer: No. Long answer: Maybe, but it would take a lot of detailed study to be absolutely sure. |
|
|
|
| |
| ▲ | haitchfive a day ago | parent | prev [-] | | I don't want to drop anything. Anti-scientific is anti-scientific. Go read some books. |
|
|
| ▲ | AkshatM a day ago | parent | prev [-] |
| Having met Casey Handmer personally, I'm confident the last thing he could be accused of is being anti-science. The man knows quite a bit about his domain of expertise! |
