▲ | hwsrtejk 19 hours ago | |||||||||||||
Absurd ideas like "applications shouldn't be able to spy on or manipulate each other without explicit permission from the user". | ||||||||||||||
▲ | roenxi 16 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||||||||
Wayland, traditionally, has not believed that. It believed "applications shouldn't be able to spy on or manipulate each other" and doesn't give users any mechanism to suggest that they might have permission to do so because the idea of that happening was just not on their radar. I'm not sure about the modern state of Wayland but last time I saw it the situation was terribly messy and I was forced back to X11 because I rely on screensharing to do my job properly. | ||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
▲ | Lammy 16 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||||||||
I gave my explicit permission by choosing to run the software in the first place. | ||||||||||||||
▲ | yjftsjthsd-h 18 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||||||||
Nobody said anything about that. Is there any reason that Xorg couldn't tack on a permission system, other than that it would be inelegant? | ||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
▲ | nurettin 17 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||||||||
"There should be global hooks and applications should be able to register themselves should they wish" would solve all these cases, but horse blinders are also very important to wear. | ||||||||||||||
▲ | 17 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||||||||
[deleted] |