You should read the comment again. It says that this article is debunking something that was never a serious claim. That is the first thing it says, and it says it very directly. It is also set apart as its own paragraph, for emphasis.

▲

aredox 14 hours ago | parent [-]

>something that was never a serious claim

And yet was claimed again and again by e.g. pediatrics societies in Switzerland and France to justify ending every restrictions (thereby mass contaminating children before they could be vaccinated, and contributing to more spread and more mutations of the virus)

	▲	deegles 10 hours ago \| parent \| next [-]
		I think they mean serious in scientific terms, not in policy making.
	▲	pessimizer 14 hours ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		I'm not arguing the claim. I'm asking a person to read was said, and respond to it, instead of to something that was not said.