▲ | caseyohara 2 days ago | |||||||
> I like the wide shot from the mountaintop better because it's lively and has people in it Agreed. And strongly related to your other comment about selfies/bugs/flowers/boring landscapes… One of the best pieces of advice for leveling up from novice snapshots to compelling photographs is: take photos about things, not photos of things. Purposefully including people in the frame goes a long way to make photos more interesting because it instantly attaches a narrative. | ||||||||
▲ | PaulHoule 2 days ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||
I've been through this with sports, the hierarchy is (1) good portraits (2) photos that show players in opposition to each other (3) photos that tell a story Developing the habit to do (1) consistently is important because photos like that are still usable. If you just chase the action in most sports the ball is between you and a player and you get a lot of shots of people's behinds so looking for the places where people are open is foundational. (3) is tough because a play involves a number of events that don't usually appear in one frame except for a few shots in a game like: | ||||||||
▲ | relaxing 2 days ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||
Alright, so continue the exercise. In the image in the article, what is the narrative for the people in the foreground? We can’t see where they are coming from or where they are, and their actions don’t seem well defined. Then in the middle there is a train station(?) where the narrative is also absent or muddled. The people arrived by train to do what? I would argue the tight shot of the mountain and house is the best capture, because it tells a story of a beautiful place where someone lives. | ||||||||
|