"Google" posted a job opening. They applied for and took the job, agreeing to posted pay and conditions. End of the story. It's not up to the Guardian to decide

▲

xkbarkar 3 days ago | parent | next [-]

I agree, article is pretty low quality ragebait. Not good journalism at all.

▲

lysace 3 days ago | parent [-]

It is amazing how much their quality levels have fallen during the past two decades.

I used to point to their reporting as something that my nation’s newspapers should seek to emulate.

(My nation’s newspapers have since fallen even lower.)

▲

jimnotgym 3 days ago | parent [-]

Is it amazing? They are struggling to make money as much as every other news organisation, they have to keep cutting costs to do it. Then they need as many click throughs from social platforms as possible so that they can sell at least some advertising. I would say it is inevitable.

	▲	lysace 3 days ago \| parent [-]
		It is inevitable that the journalistic integrity of the Guardian goes to shit?

▲

3 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

[deleted]

▲

anthonj 3 days ago | parent | prev [-]

Not so easy. What if you get hired as a physiotherapist somewhere but on your first day you find out you will work in a brothel?

Or join an hospital as nurse, but then you are asked to perform surgery as you were a doctor?

There are serious issues outlined in the article.

▲

lysace 3 days ago | parent [-]

This is not what the article is outlining.

	▲	anthonj 3 days ago \| parent [-]
		The article mentions some stories such ad the one lady requested to edit medical-related infos without having any qualifications to evaluate thir correctness. Or the one about handling disturbing concted with no previous warning and no consueling