One can hardly control one coding agent for correctness, let alone multiple ones... It's cool, but not very reliable or useful.

▲

siva7 4 days ago | parent | next [-]

It's resume driven development

▲

diggan 4 days ago | parent | prev [-]

> One can hardly control one coding agent for correctness

Why not? I'm assuming we're not talking about "vibe coding" as it's not a serious workflow, it was suggested as a joke basically, and we're talking about working together with LLMs. Why would correctness be any harder to achieve than programming without them?

	▲	tharkun__ 3 days ago \| parent [-]
		Because they output so much code. It's a wall. Using a coding agent can make your entire work day turn into doing nothing but code reviews. I.e. the least fun part: constant review of a junior dev that's on the brink of failing their probation period with random strokes of genius.