▲ | seydor a day ago | ||||||||||||||||||||||
i ve been waiting for democracies to go digital for ages. We should be electing mayors like that too. there s no reason for all this gatekeeping and secrecy in politics other than to enable corruption | |||||||||||||||||||||||
▲ | croon 10 hours ago | parent | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Correct me if I'm wrong, but there's two competing issues here: 1) You could make digital elections secure with issued digital IDs, and simply recording everyone's vote and it would be easily auditable. But no one wants elections where (the contents of) your vote is recorded somewhere. So 2) You use your digital ID to be able to vote once, but if you're no longer connected to your vote, it would be much more susceptible to tampering if you can't establish a double blind chain of custody of the votes, which is what expensive in person voting is doing very well. The first option would be great if you could somehow guarantee a corruption free future of your country where no one will come after you for your vote (hint: you can't). | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
▲ | mfru 20 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||
because there is no safe way to vote digitally | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|